Chinese gene-edited babies experiment ‘irresponsible and unethical’

A Chinese scientist has been strongly criticised after announcing the birth of twin girls whose genes he edited while they were embryos.

The controversial ‘breakthrough’ is unconfirmed, but Dr He Jiankui claims to have created the world’s first genetically edited babies, using a technique aimed at making them more resistant to HIV.

Gene editing is banned in most countries, including China, where his research was denounced as “shocking and unacceptable”.

Blatant violation

Dr He claims his work was approved by an ethics committee at Harmonicare Shenzhen Women and Children’s Hospital.

Both the hospital, and the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, where Dr He works, deny any involvement in the research.

Xu Nanping, a Chinese Government vice-minister for science and technology, said: “The genetically edited infant incident reported by media blatantly violated China’s relevant laws and regulations.

“It has also violated the ethical bottom line that the academic community adheres to.”

Unintended consequences

Qiu Renzong, a bioethicist at the Chinese Academy of Social Science in Beijing, said He’s work would damage the reputation of Chinese science, saying: “Of course it’s not ethical”.

He also questioned the validity of Dr He’s research: “Maybe he fabricated a form, and found people to sign it.”

Gene editing is illegal in the UK where it is deemed unsafe and unethical. When a gene is altered to remove one characteristic, other characteristics may be removed or changed unintentionally.

Editing the gene which allows HIV to enter a cell can make a person more susceptible to dying of flu.

Unjustifiable risk

Dr Sarah Chan, a bioethicist at the University of Edinburgh, branded He’s announcement “irresponsible and unethical”.

She said: “The claim made by those responsible for the research is that the babies have been genome edited in an attempt to make them immune to HIV.

“The lifetime risk of contracting HIV is extremely low in the first place; there are other means of prevention and it is no longer an incurable, inevitably terminal disease.

“Putting these children at such drastic risk for such a marginal gain is unjustifiable.”


Julian Savulescu, a professor of practical ethics at the University of Oxford, said: “If true, this experiment is monstrous”.

He added: “Gene editing itself is experimental and is still associated with off-target mutations, capable of causing genetic problems early and later in life, including the development of cancer.”

“This experiment exposes healthy normal children to risks of gene editing for no real necessary benefit. In many other places in the world, this would be illegal punishable by imprisonment.”

Related Resources