![]() |
|||||
|
Friday
25 January 2002
For immediate release |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
CHRISTIAN
INSTITUTE OBJECTS TO THE EXECUTIVE'S ANTI-SMACKING SLANT The Christian Institute today publishes its response to the Northern Ireland Executive's proposals to make all parental smacking illegal. The current law already protects children from 'unreasonable chastisement' but the Executive is consulting on proposals which include criminalising parents who smack their children. The Institute says that these proposals are unworkable, wrong in principle and will plunge parents into fear and confusion. Northern Ireland Assembly Member Dr Esmond Birnie MLA (UUP, South Belfast) says the Executive's smacking consultation is flawed and biased. The Christian Institute entirely agrees with Dr Birnie's statement issued earlier today (Friday). Simon Calvert, Deputy Director of The Christian Institute, said: "Loving parents who smack their children are not child abusers. They smack their children because they believe discipline is part of love, and want the best for their children. If the Executive's unworkable proposals ever see the light of day, then ordinary parents will be plunged into fear and confusion. Parents who smack their children will become criminals. The Executive say the law must change to comply with a European ruling. Executive Minister Mark Durkan says: "No change is not an option"(1) . But this is this simply is not true. If the British government say there is no need to change the law for England and Wales, then there is no need to change the law in Northern Ireland (2). The consultation implies that public opinion is deeply divided on smacking. This is untrue. The overwhelming majority of people view smacking as acceptable. An Office for National Statistics study found that 88% believed it is "sometimes necessary to smack a naughty child"(3) . Yet despite this, the Executive claims only 34% support retaining physical punishment in their survey (4). We are not surprised at this answer since the question asks people about their view on 'hitting' a child. Most people agree there is a vast difference between smacking and hitting. Yet the Executive's survey equates them. The
Executive has not produced a genuine, open or fair consultation. Its
entire approach assumes that the parental freedom to smack must be restricted.
It uses highly contentious evidence from an academic who is probably
the leading European campaigner for a total smacking ban. The Executive
even admits that very little research has been done about physical punishment
in Northern Ireland (5). Yet the consultation presents
strident anti-smacking views." For
further information contact: Note
for Editors: The Christian Institute, 26 Jesmond Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4PQ. Charity No. 100 4774 References: 1.
News Release, Department of Finance and Personnel, 11 September 2001
|
|||||