Abortion

Committee of MPs
split over abortion

Last updated: 31 October 2007

A deep rift has emerged within the Science and Technology Committee on abortion, as one member describes its findings as "biased" and "laughable".

In a rare move, dissenting MPs have challenged its conclusions by producing their own findings in what is known as a 'minority report'.

The Committee's official report calls for measures to make abortion easier. It recommends removing the need for a second doctor's signature and allowing women to take drugs at home to complete a medical abortion. The report also claims there is no significant evidence to support a reduction in the 24-week limit for abortions.

But the minority report produced by two of the MPs on the Committee contradicts these conclusions. Mrs Nadine Dorries MP, a former nurse, and Bob Spink MP have argued that the inquiry was biased. They say of the 18 witnesses called to give evidence, only five were 'pro-life'.

They also accuse the Committee of overlooking important evidence on foetal pain and viability (the capacity to live outside the womb).

Dr Spink writes in The Daily Telegraph New window icon: "It is simply laughable to compare the viability of aborted babies, who would almost all otherwise be born healthy, with babies who are sadly pre-term, usually indicating predisposing medical problems for baby or mother. But that is what the report does."

This content requires the Adobe Flash Player. Download Adobe Flash Player here.